Plant Evolution and DevelopmentwF = 0.0155 214 wB = 0.0486 4.532,44 two,02 wF = 0.0179 214 wB = 0.0527 4.527 ,PapaveroideaeFUL214 wB = 0.2272 29.091,30 25,wF = 0.MenispermaceaeFUL1 214 wB = 0.2177 29.103,48 1,wF = 0.LardizabalaceaeFUL1 wF = 0.2277 29.092,38 23,214 wB = 0.2087 29.089,81 28, wF = 0.2641 214 wB = 0.0448 four.525,63 15,214 wB = 0.0415 4.517 , 214 wB = 0.12.232,87 30, 214 wB = 0.4533 11.194,72 0,23 wF = 0.4965 214 wB = 0.4570 11.194,81 0,06 wF = 0.4288 214 wB = 0.4530 11.194,52 0,64 wF = 0.wF = 0.LardizabalaceaeFUL1a six,49 wF = 0.214 wB = 0.214 wB = 0.1634 12.231,83 32,87 wF = 0.6704 214 wB = 0.1690 12.246,45 three,63 wF = 0.2832 214 wB = 0.1791 12.240,17 16,18 wF = 0.0815 214 wB = 0.1744 wF = 0.1520 12.247 ,71 1,wF = 0.LardizabalaceaeFUL1b214 wB = 0.2140 29.101, wF = 0.0653 214 wB = 0.0499 four.532,52 1,86 wF = 0.0343 214 wB = 0.0468 four.531,34 4,22 wF = 0.1902 214 wB = 0.0462 4.532,75 1,214 wB = 0.0445 4.525,91 15,wF = 0.BerberidaceaeFUL214 wB = 0.2224 29.098,01 12,214 wB = 0.4689 11.192,92 3,84 wF = 0.3356 214 wB = 0.4529 11.194,78 0,12 wF = 0.wF = 0.RanunculaceaeFUL214 wB = 0.2197 29.103,36 1,wF = 0.EupteleaceaeEupIFL214 wB = 0.2155 29.102,73 3,214 wB = 0.1693 12.245,56 5,40 wF = 0.4318 214 wB = 0.1317 wF = 0.2825 214 wB = 0.1496 12.230,50 35,52 wF = 0.2833 214 wB = 0.1691 12.247 ,44 wF = 0.2169 214 wB = 0.1552 12.233,85 28,84 1,66 12.214,86 66, 214 wB = 0.4542 11.194,46 0,75 wF = 0.7561 214 wB = 0.3977 11.185,07 19,53 wF = 0.6255 214 wB = 0.4132 11.186,05 17 ,58 wF = 0.6871 214 wB = 0.4391 11.189,22 11,24 wF = 0.wF = 0.RanunculalesFUL2 wF = 0.214 wB = 0.1893 29.079,86 48, 214 wB = 0.0492 4.533,33 0,25 214 wB = 0.0479 4.533,45 0,00 wF = 0.0475 214 wB = 0.0477 four.533,44 0,02 wF = 0.0512 214 wB = 0.0480 four.533,44 0,01 wF = 0. wF = 0.3002 214 wB = 0.4343 11.191,52 six,63 wF = 0.6190 (Continued)wF = 0.Pa paveraceaeFUL2 29.098,05 12,214 wB = 0.1990 29.086,45 35,wF = 0.FumarioideaeFUL214 wB = 0.1086423-62-2 Formula wF = 0.7-Bromochromane-3-carboxylic acid Chemscene PapaveroideaeFUL,00 214 wB = 0.PMID:26780211 2065 29.095,76FUL like gene evolution in RanunculalesSeptember 2013 | Volume 4 | Write-up 358 |wF = 0.Pab Mora et al.FUL like gene evolution in Ranunculales2 InL (LRT)estimated parameters between models. The test was carried out for the complete dataset as well as for each of your functional domains defined for MADSbox genes. These analyses were repeated around the M, IK, andFor each from the LRTs, twice the distinction of log likelihood between the models (two lnL) was in comparison with critical values from a 2 distribution, with degree of freedom equal for the variations in quantity ofC domains so that you can evaluate whether there was a distinction in their rates of evolution in distinct taxa, offered their crucial roles in DNA binding (M), protein dimerization (IK) and multimerization (C). The colour of your asterisks indicates regardless of whether the proteins show an increase inside the degree of purifying choice (red), or even a relaxed degree of purifying choice (black). Significance: P 0.05, P 0.01, P 0.001.Ranunculales. This duplication was not recovered in previous analyses in the AP1/FUL gene lineage (Litt and Irish, 2003; Shan et al., 2007). Although these analyses suggested main duplications occurred inside the FULlike genes in Ranunculales, it was not clear once they occurred. Our analyses on an expanded sample of Ranunculales clearly established that there was a single big occasion really early in the diversification in the order, even so, continues to be unclear regardless of whether this duplication occurred before or immediately after the divergence of Eupteleaceae. In truth, low.